Founders Beta • Evidence-first estimating • Built for restoration

Property Loss Pro Software turns messy estimates into carrier-friendly scope packages.

Upload your estimate + evidence. Get back a clean, structured scope package with F9-style justifications, code/IICRC triggers, and clear alternates. Standardize the conversation, not the outcome.

Join the Beta Waitlist Watch the Demo
Not a “magic estimate button.” It’s a consistency engine: evidence → logic → scope.
Best for:
Restoration contractors
Also for:
Mitigation teams / PMs
Outputs:
Carrier-ready scope packages
Focus:
Less dispute, faster approvals
What you’ll get (every time)
  • Base Scope (Known): what’s supported by evidence now
  • Conditional Scope (Trigger-based): if X is true, do Y
  • Investigation Items: verify/measure/test before committing
  • Alternates (Path A vs B): make variability explicit
Tip: Drop a screenshot mockup here later by embedding a video below or adding an Image Block in the next section.

Estimating isn’t the problem. The approval conversation is.

Carriers don’t “hate you.” They hate ambiguity. So they cut, question, delay, and re-argue the same stuff every claim. This fixes the inputs and the logic trail so you stop bleeding time.

Before

Line items without an evidence trail. Assumptions hiding in plain sight. Disputes turn into email wars.

After

Evidence-mapped scope language, clear triggers, and alternates. Your logic is visible and defensible.

Result

Fewer re-writes, fewer supplement fights, faster approvals, and cleaner files for attorneys/owners.

How it works

Three steps. No mysticism. No “trust me bro” outputs.

1
Upload inputs
Estimate + photos + moisture mapping + notes (whatever you have).
2
Get structured scope
Base + Conditional + Investigation + Alternates with justification language.
3
Export + use
Copy/paste into estimate notes, emails, supplements, or attorney packages.

Demo

Replace the placeholder video link with your Loom/YouTube/Vimeo embed URL.

What makes it different

This is built for restoration reality: variability, documentation, and carrier friction.

Evidence-mapped output

Every scope element ties back to photos, measurements, moisture data, or notes.

F9-style justification language

Clear “why” statements that match sequencing, dependencies, and industry logic.

Alternates + triggers

Path A vs Path B so conditions are explicit, not an argument waiting to happen.

IICRC + code triggers

Flags common requirements and conditions without pretending every claim is identical.

Investigation-first guardrails

If evidence is missing, it prompts verification instead of hallucinating a scope.

Carrier-friendly packaging

Uniform structure so adjusters can scan it fast, understand it, and move on.

Beta access

Keep pricing simple at first. You’re buying feedback and case studies, not trying to “maximize LTV” on Day 1.

Best for: solo / small teams
Founders Beta
[ $X / mo ]
  • Early access + onboarding
  • Direct influence on roadmap
  • Priority support
Best for: growing ops
Pro
[ Coming Soon ]
  • Team seats
  • Workflow templates
  • More exports + integrations
Best for: multi-branch
Enterprise
[ Talk to us ]
  • Custom onboarding
  • Admin controls
  • Priority feature requests
Apply for Beta Watch the Demo

Stop re-litigating the same scope in email threads.

Join the beta and get a structured, defensible scope package that makes approvals easier and disputes rarer.
Join the Beta Waitlist Watch the Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

Still have questions? Take a look at the FAQ or reach out anytime. If you’re feeling ready, go ahead and apply.

Email Me When It's Ready

  • No. It generates a structured scope package and justification language. You still control line items and pricing.

  • ESX or PDF or CSV Xactimate or Symbility Estimate + any evidence you have (photos, moisture readings, sketches, notes). Missing evidence becomes Investigation or Conditional items.

  • No. Missing support gets flagged. It prompts verification instead of inventing scope.

  • This is evidence-driven packaging with triggers + alternates, built for carrier review and dispute reduction.

  • Restoration contractors, mitigation operations, estimators, PMs, and consultants preparing carrier adjuster facing packages.

  • Yes, and that’s where structured alternates + evidence mapping pay off the most.